<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Go on Martin C. Richards</title>
		<link>https://www.martinrichards.me/tags/go/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Go on Martin C. Richards</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-ZA</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 12:15:44 +0200</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://www.martinrichards.me/tags/go/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>When did we forget transactions are critical sections?</title>
				<link>https://www.martinrichards.me/post/when_did_we_forget_transactions_are_critical_sections/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 12:15:44 +0200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.martinrichards.me/post/when_did_we_forget_transactions_are_critical_sections/</guid>
				<description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;when-did-we-forget-transactions-are-critical-sections&#34;&gt;When did we forget transactions are critical sections?&lt;/h1&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;rsquo;t know when it became fine to pass an open database transaction around like some sort of&#xA;ambient value, but I was raised by grouchy neckbeards who taught me to treat it with respect. Open&#xA;it, do the work that needs it, give it back. I&amp;rsquo;ve seen codebases thread open transactions through&#xA;every call like a trace ID, then complain that SQL doesn&amp;rsquo;t scale.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
